VS
The head-to-head covers 2 completed meetings between SC Freiburg and Celta Vigo from 9 April 2026 to 16 April 2026. SC Freiburg won 2, Celta Vigo won 0, and no meetings were drawn; the goal tally was 6–1 from the perspective of SC Freiburg. Latest: Celta Vigo 1–3 SC Freiburg on 16 April 2026 in UEFA Europa League. Previous: SC Freiburg 3–0 Celta Vigo on 9 April 2026 in UEFA Europa League.
Match center
Starting eleven
Substitutes Celta Vigo
-
5D
-
19M
-
10F
-
39F
-
23M
-
1G
-
4D
-
12D
-
14D
-
21D
-
22M
-
18F
SC Freiburg Substitutes
-
F
7
-
F
9
-
D
43
-
M
27
-
F
22
-
G
21
-
G
24
-
D
5
-
D
17
-
D
30
-
D
65
-
F
26
Match events
-
33'⚽I. Matanovic Normal Goal (Asst: J. Makengo)
-
35'Igor Matanović Goal confirmed
-
39'⚽Y. Suzuki Normal Goal (Asst: J. Beste)
-
45'Ilaix Moriba Yellow Card
-
45'Igor Matanović Yellow Card
-
46'W. Swedberg I. Moriba
-
46'J. El Abdellaoui J. Rueda
-
46'I. Aspas B. Iglesias
-
46'S. Carreira Y. Lago
-
49'Iago Aspas Yellow Card
-
49'Matias Vecino Yellow Card
-
50'⚽Y. Suzuki Normal Goal (Asst: V. Grifo)
-
56'Matthias Ginter Yellow Card
-
56'L. Holer I. Matanovic
-
56'D. Scherhant V. Grifo
-
64'H. Alvarez M. Vecino
-
71'N. Hofler J. Manzambi
-
71'B. Ogbus P. Lienhart
-
83'C. Irie J. Beste
-
87'Hugo Álvarez Yellow Card
-
90'⚽W. Swedberg Normal Goal (Asst: H. Alvarez)
Stats for this game
Matchup SC Freiburg VS Celta Vigo
Series snapshot
Across 2 completed meetings from 9 April 2026 to 16 April 2026, SC Freiburg won 2, Celta Vigo won 0, and 0 ended level. SC Freiburg scored 6 goals, while Celta Vigo scored 1 goal. The latest meeting was Celta Vigo 1–3 SC Freiburg on 16 April 2026 in UEFA Europa League. The previous encounter was SC Freiburg 3–0 Celta Vigo on 9 April 2026 in UEFA Europa League.
Context and limits
Both meetings were recorded in UEFA Europa League (2). SC Freiburg hosted 1 meeting and won 1; Celta Vigo hosted 1 and won 0. This location split offers context but does not establish a standalone home-advantage claim. With only 2 completed fixtures in the available record, this is a compact historical snapshot rather than a prediction or a broader long-term trend. The sample remains limited to these recorded meetings. The two results should be read in sequence, with the competition and decision type retained as part of the factual context.