VS
Rangers and Plzen have met 2 times in completed fixtures from 2025 to 2025. Rangers won 1, Plzen won 1, and no matches were drawn; the goals tally is 4-2 from the perspective of Rangers. Latest: 12 August 2025: Plzen beat Rangers 2-1 in UEFA Champions League. Previous: 5 August 2025: Rangers beat Plzen 3-0 in UEFA Champions League. This record is historical context, not a forecast.
Match center
Starting eleven
Substitutes Plzen
-
31
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
14
-
20
-
37
-
49
-
50
-
52
-
63
-
99
Rangers Substitutes
-
13
-
44
-
3
-
7
-
9
-
14
-
18
-
19
-
20
-
24
-
29
Match events
-
7'Djeidi Gassama Yellow Card
-
29'Jan Paluska Yellow Card
-
41'⚽R. Durosinmi Normal Goal (Asst: A. Memic)
-
54'Danilo Pereira C. Dessers
-
56'S. Markovic S. Dweh
-
60'⚽L. Cameron Normal Goal (Asst: Danilo Pereira)
-
68'J. Rothwell M. Diomande
-
69'K. Dowell L. Cameron
-
69'C. Kabongo R. Durosinmi
-
69'C. Souare K. Spacil
-
69'M. Havel A. Memic
-
83'⚽S. Markovic Normal Goal (Asst: C. Kabongo)
-
84'Nasser Djiga Yellow Card
-
84'J. Panos M. Valenta
-
87'O. Cortes D. Gassama
-
87'N. Bajrami O. Antman
Stats for this game
Matchup Rangers VS Plzen
Record and recent results
The completed fixture record contains 2 meetings between Rangers and Plzen. Rangers have won 1, while Plzen have won 1; no matches were drawn. The aggregate score is 4-2 from the perspective of Rangers. The latest reference was 12 August 2025: Plzen beat Rangers 2-1 in UEFA Champions League. The previous result was 5 August 2025: Rangers beat Plzen 3-0 in UEFA Champions League. The teams are level on historical wins. The record provides historical context without predicting a future result.
Competition and sample context
The listed meetings run from 5 August 2025 to 12 August 2025 and include UEFA Champions League. No matches in this completed sample were decided after extra time or on penalties. Home listings, competition formats and the limited sample add context but do not establish a permanent hierarchy. The summary uses only completed FT, AET or PEN fixtures linked to this H2H and should be read as historical context, not a forecast.