VS
Chelsea and Maccabi Tel Aviv have met 2 times in completed fixtures from 2015 to 2015. Chelsea won 2, Maccabi Tel Aviv won 0, and no matches were drawn; the goals tally is 8-0 from the perspective of Chelsea. Latest: 24 November 2015: Chelsea beat Maccabi Tel Aviv 4-0 in UEFA Champions League. Previous: 16 September 2015: Chelsea beat Maccabi Tel Aviv 4-0 in UEFA Champions League. This record is historical context, not a forecast.
Match center
Starting eleven
Starting XI Maccabi Tel Aviv
-
95G
-
26D
-
31D
-
20D
-
2D
-
6M
-
7F
-
40M
-
22M
-
42
-
11F
Chelsea Starting XI
-
G
1
-
D
26
-
D
24
-
D
28
-
D
6
-
M
4
-
F
22
-
M
21
-
F
10
-
M
8
-
F
19
Substitutes Maccabi Tel Aviv
-
9F
-
16
-
10F
-
1G
-
18D
-
24M
-
28M
Chelsea Substitutes
-
F
17
-
D
5
-
F
18
-
D
2
-
M
12
-
G
27
-
M
36
Match events
-
20'⚽G. Cahill Normal Goal
-
40'Tal Ben Haim Red Card
-
59'Nemanja Matić Yellow Card
-
69'Pedro E. Hazard
-
72'K. Zouma J. Terry
-
73'⚽Willian Normal Goal
-
77'⚽Oscar Normal Goal (Asst: A. Baba)
-
79'L. Rémy Willian
-
80'E. Ben Basat T. Ben Chaim
-
84'Cesc Fàbregas Yellow Card
-
85'Y. Azulay G. Alberman
-
89'B. Itzhaki E. Zahavi
-
90' +1⚽K. Zouma Normal Goal (Asst: Oscar)
Stats for this game
Matchup Chelsea VS Maccabi Tel Aviv
Record and recent results
The completed fixture record contains 2 meetings between Chelsea and Maccabi Tel Aviv. Chelsea have won 2, while Maccabi Tel Aviv have won 0; no matches were drawn. The aggregate score is 8-0 from the perspective of Chelsea. The latest reference was 24 November 2015: Chelsea beat Maccabi Tel Aviv 4-0 in UEFA Champions League. The previous result was 16 September 2015: Chelsea beat Maccabi Tel Aviv 4-0 in UEFA Champions League. Chelsea lead the historical win count. The record provides historical context without predicting a future result.
Competition and sample context
The listed meetings run from 16 September 2015 to 24 November 2015 and include UEFA Champions League. No matches in this completed sample were decided after extra time or on penalties. Home listings, competition formats and the limited sample add context but do not establish a permanent hierarchy. The summary uses only completed FT, AET or PEN fixtures linked to this H2H and should be read as historical context, not a forecast.