VS
CF Montreal and Whitecaps have met 4 times in the completed record between 10 March 2012 and 4 June 2015. CF Montreal have won 1, Whitecaps have won 2, and one meeting ended level. The latest meeting on 4 June 2015 was CF Montreal 2–1 Whitecaps. The preceding meeting on 26 June 2014 was Whitecaps 0–0 CF Montreal. This record is historical and not a forecast.
Match center
Starting eleven
Starting XI CF Montreal
-
1G
-
23D
-
2M
-
25D
-
55D
-
10F
-
8M
-
15M
-
29M
-
16M
-
99F
Whitecaps Starting XI
-
G
1
-
D
2
-
D
4
-
18
-
D
26
-
M
7
-
M
15
-
M
31
-
M
9
-
F
11
-
F
23
Substitutes CF Montreal
-
51M
-
14M
-
24F
-
5D
-
17F
-
22G
-
36D
Whitecaps Substitutes
-
M
13
-
F
29
-
M
77
-
M
22
-
M
28
-
G
70
-
F
88
Match events
-
14'⚽J. McInerney Normal Goal
-
46'Diego Martin Rodriguez Yellow Card
-
63'M. Tissot E. Alexander
-
63'C. Techera N. Mezquida
-
70'O. Rivero M. Rosales
-
71'Tim Parker Yellow Card
-
74'P. Morales R. Teibert
-
78'N. Reo-Coker J. McInerney
-
79'⚽P. Morales Penalty
-
81'A. Jackson-Hamel P. Bernier
-
83'⚽I. Piatti Normal Goal (Asst: A. Romero)
-
90'Jordan Harvey Yellow Card
Stats for this game
Matchup CF Montreal VS Whitecaps
Whitecaps hold the stronger record
Across 4 completed meetings between 10 March 2012 and 4 June 2015, CF Montreal have won 1, Whitecaps have won 2, and one meeting ended level. The aggregate totals are 2 goals for CF Montreal and 6 for Whitecaps. The widest margin was recorded when Whitecaps beat CF Montreal 3–0 at CF Montreal in Major League Soccer. Every margin is tied to a dated fixture in the audit, and totals use the applicable final score rather than a halftime score.
Venues and recent results
Home teams won 2 of the 4 fixtures, while away teams won 1; one was drawn. The latest sequence was 4 June 2015, CF Montreal 2–1 Whitecaps; 26 June 2014, Whitecaps 0–0 CF Montreal; 21 September 2013, CF Montreal 0–3 Whitecaps. These venues and scorelines describe the completed sample and are not a forecast. The sequence is historical: it records the listed venues, scorelines and decisions, while making no claim about future form. The dataset is descriptive, not predictive.
